The latest commentary by John Greenberg of Marlboro discusses the concept of affordability in Vermont politics. He argues that the state’s high-income individuals should bear the highest tax burden, as they can afford to pay more, while middle and lower-income groups should see tax reductions. Greenberg criticizes Governor Phil Scott’s austerity approach and calls for a more progressive tax system in Vermont.
He points out that health care costs, rising premiums, and the drug and alcohol epidemic are driving government spending, making austerity a less viable solution. Greenberg suggests that raising taxes on the wealthy and reducing them for lower-income residents could help alleviate the state’s financial issues without overburdening the majority of Vermonters.
While some may argue that wealthy residents will leave the state if taxes are increased, Greenberg highlights data showing that the number of high-income individuals moving out of Vermont is relatively small. He emphasizes the importance of creating a tax system that is fair and progressive, benefiting all residents by improving public services and investing in the state’s natural environment and education system.
Overall, Greenberg’s commentary calls for a reevaluation of Vermont’s tax policies to ensure that the state’s resources are used efficiently and equitably for the benefit of all residents.
————————————————————————
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
————————————————————————