The Washington Post recently published an opinion piece discussing the stark differences in COVID-19 responses between New Hampshire and Vermont. The article highlighted how New Hampshire, which has implemented less strict restrictions and mask mandates, is facing a surge in cases and deaths, leading to what the author describes as agony in the state.
In contrast, Vermont, with its stringent measures and high vaccination rates, is experiencing lower case numbers and deaths, leading to a sense of ecstasy in the state. The author points to Vermont’s success as evidence that these measures can effectively curb the spread of the virus and save lives.
The article also examines the political and social factors at play in both states, with New Hampshire being a traditionally more conservative state and Vermont being more liberal. These differences in political ideology have influenced the states’ responses to the pandemic, with New Hampshire taking a more hands-off approach and Vermont prioritizing public health and safety.
As the pandemic continues to impact communities across the country, the author emphasizes the importance of following science-based guidelines and taking necessary precautions to protect oneself and others. They highlight Vermont as a model for effective pandemic response, showing that with the right measures in place, it is possible to control the spread of the virus and prevent unnecessary suffering.
Overall, the article serves as a reminder of the importance of responsible leadership and collective action in navigating the challenges of the pandemic. It encourages readers to prioritize public health and safety, even in the face of political or social divisions.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com